On May 7, 5G networks, as a new generation of mobile communication technology, should be faster and better than 4G networks, but this is not the case. According to speed test data from network diagnostic company Ookla, the upload and download speeds of 5G networks in countries around the world have generally declined compared to a year ago. Even the most advanced 5G networks can only reach a speed of 1 Gbps, which is far below the ideal download speed of 20 Gbps set by the International Telecommunication Union. According to IEEE, there are many reasons for this. First, as more and more users buy new mobile phones and other devices, the number of people using 5G networks has increased, leading to network congestion. This is a problem that every generation of mobile communication technology will encounter. Mark Giles, an industry analyst at Ookla, said: "If you look back at the 4G era, it was the same. So when 4G was first deployed, there was a lot of capacity available for those early users. Then as more and more users came in, the capacity was used up, and the density of base stations needed to be increased." Secondly, most operators have adopted non-standalone 5G networks when deploying 5G networks. This approach is to build 5G networks on the core infrastructure of existing 4G networks. Although the performance of non-standalone 5G networks is not as good as that of standalone 5G networks, its cost and difficulty are much lower because it does not need to be built from scratch. This strategy also limits the development of 5G networks because operators can only build 5G networks in places where there are existing base stations and other facilities. But cost is not the only factor, there are also some regulatory and licensing issues that plague operators. Especially in dense urban areas, sometimes the biggest challenge is to find a suitable place to place a new base station. In addition to cities, there are different problems in suburban or rural areas. One of the biggest selling points of 5G networks is the ability to take advantage of new frequency bands, especially millimeter wave bands (24 GHz to 40 GHz), which can support lower latency and higher data rates. But high frequency bands also have a disadvantage, which is that they have a short propagation distance. This is good for cities, but not very practical for suburban or rural areas. As more and more places start using 5G networks, there will be some performance degradation overall. IT Home noted that millimeter waves have not been widely used either, and are barely visible outside of a few countries, including the United States. Even in the United States, companies that were initially optimistic about millimeter waves, such as Verizon, have turned to other newly opened frequency bands, such as the C-band (4 GHz to 8 GHz). Giles said: "As of 2022, there are 140 operators in the world with millimeter wave licenses in 24 countries. But only 28 operators have actually deployed millimeter waves in 16 countries. So this is a very small group. Only a small number of operators are really pursuing millimeter waves." The 20 Gbps 5G download speeds originally proposed by the International Telecommunication Union remain just an ideal. Millimeter wave has some applications only in places where a large number of users need to use the network at the same time, such as stadiums and airports. But the failure to build out millimeter wave as a key component of 5G networks, whether due to high costs or technical limitations, has not helped 5G networks get through its growth stage. Of course, not all countries have 5G networks that are performing poorly. Ookla's speed test data shows that four countries are bucking the trend: Canada, Italy, Qatar, and the United States. For the United States, Giles believes that more available new spectrum bands have helped the country's operators stay ahead of the curve on new networks. And for Qatar, heavy investments for the 2022 World Cup include building a strong 5G network. It’s unclear whether the early setbacks of 5G networks will affect the development of 6G networks, but there are some possible effects. For example, given the disappointing performance of millimeter waves, the industry may reduce investment in terahertz wave research and instead consider how to merge cellular and Wi-Fi technologies in areas that need dense coverage. |
<<: How long will it take for 5G small base stations to "take off"?
>>: Enabling Zero Trust Networking for Microservices with Istio Service Mesh
Throughout history, every social transformation, ...
PacificRack started selling the new Virtualizor p...
The 2021 Communications Industry Statistical Bull...
Someone on LET sent an email notification, indica...
OneTechCloud is a Chinese business founded in 201...
Faced with the sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pa...
IPv6 should have been developed greatly in the pa...
Let’s first understand the key technologies of Wi...
[[389534]] According to a recent survey report re...
[[435113]] Mobile edge computing, artificial inte...
The computer networks we typically imagine involv...
2020 was supposed to be the year 5G went global, ...
[51CTO.com original article] Recently, Huawei and...
URL Uniform Resource Locator (URL) is a reference...
At a time when all walks of life are experiencing...