Three approaches to Bluetooth low energy development

Three approaches to Bluetooth low energy development

Ask any IoT vendor what makes their product exciting? They all point to the application, the unique way the device delivers value to the user. It makes sense, therefore, to focus your development resources on your application: first, last, and always. However, for your application to work, you need reliable connectivity. This comes from technologies like Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

Bluetooth Low Energy is an excellent choice for connecting IoT products with mobile devices and/or the cloud. It's flexible, reliable, widely supported, and easy on batteries. There's just one problem: Opening the BLE SDK and looking through the API can present even the most experienced developers with a wall of complexity.

Learning to deal with this complexity requires a lot of resources, resources that are better spent on features that differentiate your product. From the user's perspective, connectivity just needs to work. But while the BLE stack is largely invisible to the user, it requires a lot of expertise to optimize. Frankly, that's because the BLE code is a little weird.

Facing the complexity of Bluetooth low energy

The typical API in a BLE stack is full of unfamiliar terms like GAP, GATT, CCCD, and "blob requests." The code follows its own set of rules and is not well documented. This adds cost and complexity to the development cycle of any IoT product.

Additionally, BLE systems require three additional areas of development, each of which must work seamlessly with the next:

Firmware development: This is the embedded software that runs on the chipset. The firmware must be configured and optimized to get the data where it is needed, when it is needed, without damaging the battery. Chances are, the firmware developer on your team won't have a lot of pre-existing Bluetooth knowledge.

Mobile application development: Mobile developers are often experts in iOS, Android, or both, but not Bluetooth. Many Bluetooth features on mobile devices are confusing and undocumented, so developing BLE expertise from scratch takes a lot of time.

System-level architecture: Bluetooth development challenges are similar on both the firmware and mobile sides. But there are also system-level difficulties. Firmware and mobile developers must agree on common parameters, behaviors, and communication details. This collaboration must continue throughout the production timeline; otherwise, you will encounter interoperability deficiencies.

So, how do you address the complexity of the BLE stack? You basically have three options, and for most IoT projects, only one of them is the right choice.

Three paths for Bluetooth low energy development

If you’re building an IoT device, you’ll have a team of developers: firmware developers, mobile developers, or maybe just one expert handling both sides of the system. The trick is to give your developers the tools they need to create robust, reliable Bluetooth connections, without bugs or interoperability flaws, and without exceeding time or cost.

Below are three ways to approach Bluetooth low energy development. They are listed in descending order, from worst to best in terms of simplicity, cost savings, and faster time to market.

3. Take the time to learn all about Bluetooth

The first option for Bluetooth development is to develop your own in-house expertise. This is easier said than done. The libraries provided by iOS, Android, and chip manufacturers mean little if the firmware and mobile developers have no experience with Bluetooth. For example, what are GAP and GATT? How should PDU and MTU sizes be set? What connection parameters should be used, and how should they be configured?

Developing a BLE system is almost like learning multiple new languages ​​without a textbook. A lot of the expertise is essentially tribal knowledge: you have to spend a lot of time on obscure forums. This form of self-education is very time-consuming. It also increases the risk of errors. Often, these errors don’t become apparent until after the product has shipped.

So what's the next option?

2. Hire a Bluetooth Low Energy Consultant

If you don't have the time to train yourself, you can always seek outside help. Unfortunately, there are very few software consultants specializing in BLE. They are also quite expensive. So the first disadvantage of the consulting route is the cost.

The fact is that many consulting firms are not actually Bluetooth experts. Most are generalists, knowledgeable when it comes to microcontrollers and protocol combinations, but not as knowledgeable in the unique ecosystem of BLE.

Given the cost and complexity of working with a Bluetooth consultant, you may want to explore another route. This brings us to the most efficient ways to bring BLE capabilities to your IoT product with your existing development team and without a steep learning curve.

1. Use Bluetooth Low Energy Middleware Platform

The Bluetooth Low Energy Middleware Platform is a software layer that sits between the Bluetooth stack and the application: both firmware and mobile. This middleware reformats the confusing code of chip vendors into a familiar English readable language using a simplified API. It removes many unnecessary feature sets built into the chip ecosystem while pre-optimizing the application to meet your unique goals, whether it is high throughput, low energy, security, or all three.

The middleware supports both firmware developers and mobile developers while simplifying the overall system architecture that encompasses both worlds. In short, the middleware allows any developer to create reliable, optimized BLE systems without having to become (or hire) an expert. In a sense, the middleware is your expert. By demystifying Bluetooth Low Energy development with middleware, your team can focus on the features that make your product unique.

<<:  Four trends will occur in the telecommunications industry in 2023

>>:  How 5G can help realize massive IoT

Recommend

5G brings edge cloud services to the forefront

Among the many business opportunities created by ...

US reportedly allows chip sales to Huawei but only for non-5G business

Things have been bad for Huawei since the US ban....

Can 5G drive innovation in the smart home market?

[[348075]] We still have a long way to go before ...

SDN Trend Review: 2016 is the First Year of Software-Defined WAN

As 2016 enters its first day, Software Defined Wi...

2017Q1 China Wireless Router Market Research Report

With the popularity of WiFi and mobile devices, w...

Internet chat, what have you learned?

I believe there is no need to elaborate on what t...

What are the layers of the TCP/IP network model?

Let me ask you, why do we need the TCP/IP network...

SD-WAN vs. VPN: How Do They Differ?

When it comes to comparing SD-WAN vs. VPN service...

Qianjia Viewpoint | Simplifying Smart Cities

Challenges facing smart cities When designing a s...