Three approaches to Bluetooth low energy development

Three approaches to Bluetooth low energy development

Ask any IoT vendor what makes their product exciting? They all point to the application, the unique way the device delivers value to the user. It makes sense, therefore, to focus your development resources on your application: first, last, and always. However, for your application to work, you need reliable connectivity. This comes from technologies like Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

Bluetooth Low Energy is an excellent choice for connecting IoT products with mobile devices and/or the cloud. It's flexible, reliable, widely supported, and easy on batteries. There's just one problem: Opening the BLE SDK and looking through the API can present even the most experienced developers with a wall of complexity.

Learning to deal with this complexity requires a lot of resources, resources that are better spent on features that differentiate your product. From the user's perspective, connectivity just needs to work. But while the BLE stack is largely invisible to the user, it requires a lot of expertise to optimize. Frankly, that's because the BLE code is a little weird.

Facing the complexity of Bluetooth low energy

The typical API in a BLE stack is full of unfamiliar terms like GAP, GATT, CCCD, and "blob requests." The code follows its own set of rules and is not well documented. This adds cost and complexity to the development cycle of any IoT product.

Additionally, BLE systems require three additional areas of development, each of which must work seamlessly with the next:

Firmware development: This is the embedded software that runs on the chipset. The firmware must be configured and optimized to get the data where it is needed, when it is needed, without damaging the battery. Chances are, the firmware developer on your team won't have a lot of pre-existing Bluetooth knowledge.

Mobile application development: Mobile developers are often experts in iOS, Android, or both, but not Bluetooth. Many Bluetooth features on mobile devices are confusing and undocumented, so developing BLE expertise from scratch takes a lot of time.

System-level architecture: Bluetooth development challenges are similar on both the firmware and mobile sides. But there are also system-level difficulties. Firmware and mobile developers must agree on common parameters, behaviors, and communication details. This collaboration must continue throughout the production timeline; otherwise, you will encounter interoperability deficiencies.

So, how do you address the complexity of the BLE stack? You basically have three options, and for most IoT projects, only one of them is the right choice.

Three paths for Bluetooth low energy development

If you’re building an IoT device, you’ll have a team of developers: firmware developers, mobile developers, or maybe just one expert handling both sides of the system. The trick is to give your developers the tools they need to create robust, reliable Bluetooth connections, without bugs or interoperability flaws, and without exceeding time or cost.

Below are three ways to approach Bluetooth low energy development. They are listed in descending order, from worst to best in terms of simplicity, cost savings, and faster time to market.

3. Take the time to learn all about Bluetooth

The first option for Bluetooth development is to develop your own in-house expertise. This is easier said than done. The libraries provided by iOS, Android, and chip manufacturers mean little if the firmware and mobile developers have no experience with Bluetooth. For example, what are GAP and GATT? How should PDU and MTU sizes be set? What connection parameters should be used, and how should they be configured?

Developing a BLE system is almost like learning multiple new languages ​​without a textbook. A lot of the expertise is essentially tribal knowledge: you have to spend a lot of time on obscure forums. This form of self-education is very time-consuming. It also increases the risk of errors. Often, these errors don’t become apparent until after the product has shipped.

So what's the next option?

2. Hire a Bluetooth Low Energy Consultant

If you don't have the time to train yourself, you can always seek outside help. Unfortunately, there are very few software consultants specializing in BLE. They are also quite expensive. So the first disadvantage of the consulting route is the cost.

The fact is that many consulting firms are not actually Bluetooth experts. Most are generalists, knowledgeable when it comes to microcontrollers and protocol combinations, but not as knowledgeable in the unique ecosystem of BLE.

Given the cost and complexity of working with a Bluetooth consultant, you may want to explore another route. This brings us to the most efficient ways to bring BLE capabilities to your IoT product with your existing development team and without a steep learning curve.

1. Use Bluetooth Low Energy Middleware Platform

The Bluetooth Low Energy Middleware Platform is a software layer that sits between the Bluetooth stack and the application: both firmware and mobile. This middleware reformats the confusing code of chip vendors into a familiar English readable language using a simplified API. It removes many unnecessary feature sets built into the chip ecosystem while pre-optimizing the application to meet your unique goals, whether it is high throughput, low energy, security, or all three.

The middleware supports both firmware developers and mobile developers while simplifying the overall system architecture that encompasses both worlds. In short, the middleware allows any developer to create reliable, optimized BLE systems without having to become (or hire) an expert. In a sense, the middleware is your expert. By demystifying Bluetooth Low Energy development with middleware, your team can focus on the features that make your product unique.

<<:  Four trends will occur in the telecommunications industry in 2023

>>:  How 5G can help realize massive IoT

Recommend

Monitor infrastructure to prevent unexpected downtime

[[258649]] 【51CTO.com Quick Translation】Infrastru...

If your HTML is full of Divs, be careful

Students who do front-end development know that t...

FAA announces agreement with AT&T, Verizon to expand C-band 5G signals

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it...

What is 5G IoT?

What is non-cellular 5G? I imagine most readers a...

The most feared problems when migrating from data center to IDC data center

1. Introduction When an enterprise wants to chang...

Kubernetes network technology analysis: Pod communication based on routing mode

Preface Pods can communicate with each other with...

How to choose NB-IoT, Cat.1, and Cat.M for IoT device communication?

1. What is NB-IoT NB-IoT (Narrow Band Internet of...

Advantages and Challenges of 5G Network Slicing

The fifth generation of mobile communication syst...

Hostmem: $11.99/year KVM-512MB/10GB/500GB/Los Angeles data center

Hostmem is a Chinese VPS service provider. The tr...

5G toB: The next battle between operators and OTT?

In the 5G era, will the battle between operators ...

Worth learning! 10 good habits of network administrators

【51CTO.com Quick Translation】I have been a comic ...

Unleash the power of 5G! H3C launches MSR series 5G routers

With the advent of the 5G era, 5G routers serve a...

Launchvps: $19.95/year KVM-768MB/20GB/768GB/Philadelphia Data Center

Launchvps recently launched two special annual pa...

Deployment of the next generation ultra-broadband access network in the 5G era

In the 5G era, the demand for ultra-broadband acc...