Will remote work boost unified communications interoperability?

Will remote work boost unified communications interoperability?

As more employees work remotely from home during the pandemic, unified communications (UC) interoperability has received increasing attention. Although some progress has been made, there is still a long way to go.

[[333194]]

Some believe that remote work will remain very popular after the coronavirus outbreak is effectively controlled. If this is the case, then interoperability between enterprise-level services should be improved now, but unified communications interoperability still has a long way to go. Enterprises need to communicate with internal and external teams, customers and business partners, and employees working from home may have to switch back and forth between various vendor unified communications applications to perform their normal work duties.

Interoperability is not an issue from a traditional public switched telephone network perspective, but it is a major hurdle when it comes to in-application IP voice, IM, and video conferencing services. For example, if an IT department deploys Cisco UC voice, video, and chat services, and a business partner uses Microsoft, Zoom, Slack, or a similar unified communications tool, interoperability will become an issue. That said, having issues with vendor interoperability is nothing new, it’s just that remote work has magnified the problem as face-to-face interactions are significantly reduced in favor of technology-based alternatives.

How will unified communications vendors respond?

To that end, the need for better interoperability has probably never been greater. How will UC vendors respond to the issues that remain? The past few years have seen some attempts by vendors to work together to provide UC interoperability. Cisco and Microsoft announced last year that they would devise a way for video conferencing devices that use Cisco Webex and Session Initiation Protocol to work in Microsoft Teams meetings, just one example. While this is a good start, it falls far short of what is truly needed from an interoperability perspective.

Why is interoperability between multiple vendors so difficult to achieve? Because UC vendors want to maintain or expand their share of the UC market. If all platforms and services can interoperate out of the box, there will be little differentiation between vendors' services except for the price, and profit margins will be greatly reduced. This is one of the important reasons why UC vendors are cautious in establishing interoperability partnerships. It is foreseeable that vendors will not change this behavior quickly.

<<:  HTTP working principle and case analysis

>>:  5G+AI win-win symbiosis, artificial intelligence has great potential!

Recommend

With the advent of SD-WAN, are branch routers no longer necessary?

Routing software and software-defined WAN technol...

What changes does 5G bring to the medical industry?

Some people say that 2G brought us mobile Interne...

Jiangsu Cable and Ruijie Networks jointly build the "Smart Confucius Temple"

In ancient times, there was a saying that went, &...

What challenges and opportunities will operator networks face in the 5G era?

With the official commercial use of 5G in China, ...

Detailed explanation of TCP/IP acceleration principle

Please look at this case first: For a certain key...

MiWi protocol, a network protocol suitable for small IoT

There are many ways to achieve short-distance com...