Out-of-the-box infrastructure connectivity options

Out-of-the-box infrastructure connectivity options

When it comes to connecting network devices across campuses, we have always upgraded existing cabling with similar cabling, using the latest upgrades to achieve better performance. For example, CAT 5 cabling is often upgraded to CAT 6A, and OM1/OM2 multimode fiber is often upgraded to OM3 or OM4 specifications.

While this approach is perfectly acceptable in 2021, it’s important to also research new and emerging connectivity options that may ultimately be better suited to your business’ needs. Let’s look at four “out-of-the-box” connectivity technologies you may want to consider for your next plant upgrade project.

[[425613]]

Wireless Technologies as Backhaul

When connecting floors or buildings to a central network, copper or fiber optic cabling is almost exclusively used. In most cases, physical cabling provides the speed and reliability required by most businesses. That said, the cost of running new cabling in new or existing buildings has rapidly increased over the past decade or so. Additionally, running cabling in certain types of buildings is difficult, if not impossible.

Fortunately, wireless technology in the 60GHz spectrum has advanced to the point where it can transmit data at gigabit speeds with high reliability. For businesses that are looking for a flexible, low-cost alternative to physical cable backhaul links, wireless connectivity is something that should be seriously considered.

Fiber to the Desktop (FTTD)

The concept of FTTD has been around for years. However, most IT departments did not see the benefits of deploying more expensive fiber optic cables in place of twisted pair copper cabling in the early days. FTTD in 2021 makes more sense today than it did five years ago, negatively impacting the deployment of physical copper plants in office spaces, small rooms, and anywhere IoT devices need to be placed. These reasons include:

  • Electromagnetic interference (EMI) has increased in offices due to a significant increase in the deployment of PoE terminals and IoT sensors throughout buildings. This interference can negatively impact the performance of connections that do not require PoE. Fiber optics are immune to EMI and are therefore more suitable for these types of environments.
  • Newer copper cables (CAT 6A and above) are thicker and heavier than older cables. Fiber optic is a lighter and smaller option for cable runs that don't have a lot of room in ceilings or horizontal cable trays.
  • Standard copper Ethernet interfaces can transmit data up to 100 meters in length. Fiber optics, on the other hand, can transmit data much further, depending on the fiber optic transceiver used. Because of this, network cabinets running FTTD can be consolidated to save hardware, maintenance, and power costs.

5G LAN

Enterprises are increasingly relying on their Wi-Fi networks to transmit mission-critical data from PCs, phones, tablets, and wireless IoT/IIoT sensors. This increase in usage, along with increasing interference from unlicensed 2.4, 5, and 6 GHz frequencies, has many enterprises looking at alternatives to private 5G LANs.

5G LANs operate in the 3.5 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) spectrum. CBRS differs from unlicensed Wi-Fi because it uses a shared spectrum model. This model requires companies to reserve channel space and ensure that other transmissions do not interfere with each other. This largely eliminates concerns about internal and external interference that can severely affect data transmission performance.

Hybrid Fiber Optics

IoT and IIoT devices often require sensors or endpoints to not only establish a network connection via a cable, but also receive power delivered over the same cable. For many years, Power over Ethernet (PoE) over twisted pair has been the only option. However, due to the added weight and distance limitations of copper cables mentioned earlier, some IoT/IIoT deployments may require expensive and complex workarounds to deliver both network and power over a single connection.

In this regard, hybrid powered fiber cabling is a great alternative connectivity option. This cabling combines fiber transmission with a pair of copper wires for delivering power to remote devices. While hybrid powered fiber might be relegated to a deployment option for niche use cases, such as surveillance cameras, door access controllers, or IIoT implementations, it’s good to know that this option is now widely available.

<<:  5G and edge computing are a perfect match

>>:  Three-minute review! A quick overview of 5G industry development trends in September 2021

Recommend

Essential for IoT experts: Network protocol stack LwIP (I)

need: In IoT devices, the TCP/IP network protocol...

Mobile networks want to kill WiFi, but it won’t work in China

According to a recent report by OpenSignal Mobile...

What is the difference between 5G bearer network?

Hello everyone, I am Xiaozaojun. In today’s artic...

Are 5G base stations harmful to the human body?

By the end of 2020, my country has built a total ...

What is the difference between 5G and 5GHz Wi-Fi?

Are 5G and 5 GHz Wi-Fi the same thing? No, but te...

How to improve the energy efficiency of communication construction?

In recent years, as the demand for connectivity c...