Gcore (gcorelabs) Russian Khabarovsk VPS simple test
|
In the last article, I shared the simple test information of Gcore (gcorelabs)'s Japanese VPS. This time, let's take a look at the Russian Khabarovsk data center. It is also based on the KVM architecture, but this time I chose to order a lower configuration and price, which is the lowest 1.08 euros/month 488M deposit that I shared recently. I also did a simple test and posted the information for your reference. This package configuration is relatively low, so you can focus on the line. gcorelabs provides a lot of product data centers. I will slowly order the lowest packages of some of the data centers that I am interested in in batches. If you are interested in this company, you can pay attention. Official website: https://gcorelabs.com/cn/hosting/vds/ Computer room and configurationThe VPS described in this article is located in Khabarovsk, Russia, with a configuration of 1 core CPU + 488MB memory + 8GB hard disk + 188M bandwidth = €1.08/month, and the operating system is also CentOS7.9 Basic InformationAll the merchant's computer room VPSs are provided with the same vmmanager panel and independent control. The panel information is included in the product information email, and you can also log in to the panel with one click through the member center. The panel provides all the common management functions of the VPS host, so I will not post the picture here. IO and bandwidth information Two different one-key commands are used here, so the results of the two commands are posted. There is little difference between the two test results. We can combine them to see that compared with the Japanese VPS tested last time, the IO is a little lower, but the bandwidth is much higher. Considering the configuration and price of this package itself, it is worth the money. Outbound Routing You can also access the VPS through domestic telecom, Unicom and mobile networks to check the line status. Judging from the telecoms in the above three regions, the overall routes are consistent, starting point → Beijing → Tianjin → Russia. In fact, I have tested telecoms in more regions and the same is true, which is relatively stable; the same is true for China Unicom. The following are the test results of China Unicom. Whether it is China Telecom or China Unicom, the lines are very stable and the same in all regions. The outbound route of the mobile broadband test is also relatively consistent, but it is relatively poor compared to China Telecom and China Unicom. Both go from the starting point to Beijing, then to Germany and then to Russia, making a detour. Backhaul Routing The return test runs the script in the host. Like the outbound test, China Telecom and China Unicom lines are generally better, but China Mobile is not recommended. Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.69 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.181 1.42 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.24 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.160 1.34 ms http: json http: json 5 188.254.90.105 0.35 ms http: json http: json 6 95.167.20.254 44.48 ms http: json http: json 7 219.158.16.81 57.01 ms http: json http: json 8 219.158.16.81 53.44 ms http: json http: json 9 219.158.18.69 76.20 ms http: json http: json 10 * 11 61.148.159.30 86.06 ms http: json http: json 12 124.65.194.42 80.24 ms http: json http: json 13 * 15 * 16 123.125.99.1 80.80 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.149.128.9 (180.149.128.9), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.23 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.25 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.31 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 0.39 ms http: json http: json 5 81.173.24.2 58.94 ms http: json http: json 6 81.173.24.13 59.31 ms http: json http: json 7 81.173.24.9 59.20 ms http: json http: json 8 202.97.30.229 54.72 ms http: json http: json 9 202.97.12.53 59.65 ms http: json http: json 10 * 11 180.149.128.9 73.90 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.24 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.181 0.84 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.177 0.26 ms http: json http: json 4 78.25.77.164 0.64 ms http: json http: json 5 83.169.204.50 141.96 ms http: json http: json 6 80.81.195.121 139.65 ms http: json http: json 7 223.120.10.41 142.08 ms http: json http: json 8 * 16 * 17 211.136.95.226 285.01 ms http: json http: json 18 211.136.95.226 285.78 ms http: json http: json 19 * 20 211.136.25.153 386.78 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Shanghai CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 58.247.8.158 (58.247.8.158), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.29 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.181 0.21 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.42 ms http: json http: json 4 188.254.90.105 0.41 ms http: json http: json 5 188.254.90.105 0.80 ms http: json http: json 6 188.128.15.214 41.20 ms http: json http: json 7 219.158.16.81 53.32 ms http: json http: json 8 219.158.16.81 50.26 ms http: json http: json 9 219.158.16.86 105.21 ms http: json http: json 10 * 11 58.247.221.178 105.93 ms http: json http: json 12 139.226.225.22 104.73 ms http: json http: json 13 58.247.8.153 110.19 ms http: json http: json 30 * Traceroute to China, Shanghai CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 180.153.28.5 (180.153.28.5), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.39 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.23 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.177 0.35 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 23.54 ms http: json http: json 5 217.150.56.138 2.19 ms http: json http: json 6 81.173.24.9 60.21 ms http: json http: json 7 202.97.30.225 79.88 ms http: json http: json 8 202.97.30.225 73.39 ms http: json http: json 9 * 12 * 13 124.74.166.14 92.53 ms http: json http: json 14 101.227.255.34 87.97 ms http: json http: json 15 180.153.28.5 87.65 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Shanghai CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 221.183.55.22 (221.183.55.22), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.21 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.59 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 3.39 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 0.33 ms http: json http: json 5 78.25.77.164 11.08 ms http: json http: json 6 80.81.195.121 151.21 ms http: json http: json 7 223.120.10.41 141.69 ms http: json http: json 8 223.120.10.41 141.69 ms http: json http: json 9 * 10 221.183.55.22 394.99 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Guangzhou CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 210.21.4.130 (210.21.4.130), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.24 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.181 0.26 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.177 0.30 ms http: json http: json 4 188.254.90.105 6.62 ms http: json http: json 5 188.254.90.105 6.18 ms http: json http: json 6 188.128.106.113 0.95 ms http: json http: json 7 219.158.3.177 57.15 ms http: json http: json 8 219.158.3.177 55.17 ms http: json http: json 9 219.158.5.153 110.41 ms http: json http: json 10 219.158.8.82 141.36 ms http: json http: json 11 120.83.0.58 141.87 ms http: json http: json 12 120.80.175.70 134.59 ms http: json http: json 30 * Traceroute to China, Guangzhou CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 113.108.209.1 (113.108.209.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.47 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.51 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.26 ms http: json http: json 4 217.150.56.138 0.98 ms http: json http: json 5 * 6 81.173.24.13 60.48 ms http: json http: json 7 202.97.30.225 73.45 ms http: json http: json 8 202.97.81.137 63.05 ms http: json http: json 9 202.97.53.73 78.04 ms http: json http: json 10 202.97.65.50 100.48 ms http: json http: json 11 202.97.65.50 121.33 ms http: json http: json 12 113.108.209.1 102.19 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Guangzhou CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 120.196.212.25 (120.196.212.25), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.23 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.29 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.27 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 2.47 ms http: json http: json 5 83.169.204.58 141.88 ms http: json http: json 6 80.81.195.121 140.02 ms http: json http: json 7 223.120.10.85 144.54 ms http: json http: json 8 223.120.10.85 144.89 ms http: json http: json 9 * 10 * 11 221.183.55.62 411.69 ms http: json http: json 12 221.183.52.85 480.28 ms http: json http: json 13 111.24.4.253 408.61 ms http: json http: json 14 111.24.14.86 369.94 ms http: json http: json 15 211.136.249.93 417.43 ms http: json http: json 16 211.139.180.106 464.90 ms http: json http: json 17 211.136.249.17 366.69 ms http: json http: json 18 * 19 120.196.212.25 469.21 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Shanghai CU AS9929 (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 210.13.66.238 (210.13.66.238), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.19 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.23 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.49 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 0.28 ms http: json http: json 5 217.150.56.138 0.84 ms http: json http: json 6 149.6.168.201 114.65 ms http: json http: json 7 154.25.12.77 141.99 ms http: json http: json 8 154.54.61.241 125.23 ms http: json http: json 9 149.11.84.106 199.07 ms http: json http: json 10 154.54.58.225 136.14 ms http: json http: json 11 154.54.37.30 140.04 ms http: json http: json 12 218.105.2.198 195.69 ms http: json http: json 13 154.25.12.77 141.21 ms http: json http: json 14 210.13.66.238 208.27 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Shanghai CT CN2 (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 58.32.0.1 (58.32.0.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.48 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.24 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.177 0.42 ms http: json http: json 4 10.255.10.161 0.65 ms http: json http: json 5 213.248.99.222 485.02 ms http: json http: json 6 213.248.99.222 141.33 ms http: json http: json 7 213.248.99.221 112.37 ms http: json http: json 8 62.115.136.80 143.22 ms http: json http: json 9 62.115.122.161 148.36 ms http: json http: json 10 80.91.249.10 155.03 ms http: json http: json 11 80.239.193.226 139.20 ms http: json http: json 12 * 15 * 16 58.32.0.1 217.05 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Guangzhou CT CN2 Gaming Broadband (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 119.121.0.1 (119.121.0.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.22 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.182 0.24 ms http: json http: json 3 10.255.10.178 0.26 ms http: json http: json 4 188.254.90.105 1.38 ms http: json http: json 5 213.248.99.222 494.77 ms http: json http: json 6 63.217.237.29 72.15 ms http: json http: json 7 63.223.17.50 72.42 ms http: json http: json 8 63.216.143.46 92.86 ms http: json http: json 9 * 10 62.115.122.189 148.77 ms http: json http: json 11 80.239.193.226 140.40 ms http: json http: json 12 * 13 * 14 119.121.0.1 83.35 ms http: json http: json Traceroute to China, Beijing Dr.Peng Home Network (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 14.131.128.1 (14.131.128.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.67 ms http: json http: json 2 10.255.10.181 0.23 ms http: 503 http: 503 3 10.255.10.177 1.81 ms http: json http: json 4 188.254.90.105 0.36 ms http: 503 http: 503 5 188.128.106.115 1.02 ms http: 503 http: 503 6 188.128.106.115 0.99 ms http: 503 http: 503 7 219.158.3.141 53.83 ms http: 503 http: 503 8 219.158.5.149 109.01 ms http: 503 http: 503 9 219.158.5.149 106.48 ms http: 503 http: 503 30 * Traceroute to China, Beijing Dr.Peng Network IDC Network (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.167.230.100 (211.167.230.100), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.34 ms http: 503 http: 503 2 10.255.10.181 0.25 ms http: 503 http: 503 3 10.255.10.178 0.22 ms http: 503 http: 503 4 188.254.90.105 0.50 ms http: 503 http: 503 5 188.254.90.105 7.47 ms http: 503 http: 503 6 188.128.106.113 1.06 ms http: 503 http: 503 7 188.128.15.214 39.60 ms http: 503 http: 503 8 219.158.3.133 53.81 ms http: 503 http: 503 9 61.149.203.46 88.87 ms http: 503 http: 503 10 * 11 202.96.13.114 88.07 ms http: 503 http: 503 12 218.241.244.22 87.22 ms http: 503 http: 503 13 218.241.244.22 87.47 ms http: 503 http: 503 14 124.205.97.138 88.59 ms http: 503 http: 503 15 218.241.253.130 87.10 ms http: 503 http: 503 16 * 17 211.167.230.100 87.33 ms http: 503 http: 503 Traceroute to China, Beijing CERNET (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 202.205.109.205 (202.205.109.205), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 1.39 ms http: 503 http: 503 2 10.255.10.182 0.21 ms http: 503 http: 503 3 10.255.10.177 0.19 ms http: 503 http: 503 4 10.255.10.161 0.27 ms http: 503 http: 503 5 212.188.2.57 9.58 ms http: 503 http: 503 6 195.34.59.248 69.89 ms http: 503 http: 503 7 123.255.91.118 76.31 ms http: 503 http: 503 8 * 9 101.4.114.181 119.54 ms http: 503 http: 503 10 101.4.114.58 112.52 ms http: 503 http: 503 11 101.4.114.58 115.03 ms http: 503 http: 503 12 101.4.116.81 110.17 ms http: 503 http: 503 13 202.112.38.158 110.83 ms http: 503 http: 503 14 202.112.38.158 110.60 ms http: 503 http: 503 15 202.205.109.205 111.25 ms http: 503 http: 503 Traceroute to China, Beijing CSTNET (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 159.226.254.1 (159.226.254.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.31 ms http: 503 http: 503 2 10.255.10.181 1.77 ms http: 503 http: 503 3 10.255.10.177 0.22 ms http: 503 http: 503 4 217.150.56.138 0.84 ms http: 503 http: 503 5 95.167.95.111 73.27 ms http: 503 http: 503 6 63.217.237.29 75.21 ms http: 503 http: 503 7 63.223.17.94 74.58 ms http: 503 http: 503 8 63.223.17.94 76.07 ms http: 503 http: 503 9 159.226.254.5 105.53 ms http: 503 http: 503 10 159.226.254.1 108.49 ms http: 503 http: 503 Traceroute to China, Beijing GCable (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop) ============================================================ traceroute to 211.156.140.17 (211.156.140.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 92.38.131.1 0.22 ms http: 503 http: 503 2 10.255.10.181 0.27 ms http: 503 http: 503 3 10.255.10.178 1.25 ms http: 503 http: 503 4 217.150.56.138 1.08 ms http: 503 http: 503 5 217.150.56.138 0.92 ms http: 503 http: 503 6 81.173.24.2 58.96 ms http: 503 http: 503 7 202.97.30.225 74.31 ms http: 503 http: 503 8 202.97.12.49 59.41 ms http: 503 http: 503 9 * 10 219.141.147.229 86.90 ms http: 503 http: 503 11 219.141.147.229 67.45 ms http: 503 http: 503 12 60.247.93.254 65.13 ms http: 503 http: 503 13 60.247.93.254 67.58 ms http: 503 http: 503 14 211.156.128.198 87.66 ms http: 503 http: 503 15 211.156.128.85 64.33 ms http: 503 http: 503 16 * 17 211.156.140.17 69.32 ms http: 503 http: 503 Ping TestThe test results were also obtained using IPIP.NET across the country and the Asia-Pacific region. The domestic delays for China Telecom and China Unicom are excellent, while the delay for China Mobile is relatively high. In general, the quality of the domestic access line of the Khabarovsk data center is still good, and it is recommended for Telecom/Unicom users, but mobile broadband users should try to consider other areas. After all, the merchant has more than 30 data centers to choose from (such as Singapore/Hong Kong, China, etc.). You can directly view the test IP information on the official website: https://gcorelabs.com |
<<: Gcore (gcorelabs) Japanese VPS simple test
>>: RackNerd: $16.5/year KVM-1.5GB/20GB/3TB/Los Angeles MC Data Center
Recommend
SmartHost: $4.95/month KVM-quad core/8GB memory/40GB NVMe/2TB monthly traffic/29 data centers available
SmartHost recently offered special discount codes...
In fact, IPv6 is not so perfect
Everything has its two sides, and technology is n...
4G is already fast enough, why do we need 5G?
Whether it is the development of the Internet or ...
HostKvm 20% off, Singapore VPS monthly payment starts from $5.6, 2G memory/40G hard disk/50M bandwidth
HostKvm has launched a regular promotion this mon...
Justhost newly launched data centers in Hong Kong/Italy, 200Mbps unlimited data starting from $3.7/month
I received the latest email from Justhost, which ...
Interrupt or poll? It's so troublesome to get a data packet!
New employees in the network department My name i...
These seven technology topics are the hottest in 2018. If you don’t know them, you’ll be out of date
USA Today reported that from ultra-fast 5G wirele...
What is the principle of WebSocket? Why can it achieve persistent connection?
[[396397]] To better understand WebSocket, we nee...
Yecao Cloud: Hong Kong VPS annual payment starts from 139 yuan, Hong Kong dedicated server starts from 199 yuan/month
Yecaoyun is a Chinese hosting company founded in ...
uCPE/vCPE and the network: You are in me, I am in you
IDC believes that the acceptance and adoption of ...
Huawei holds AI Summit for Teachers from 100 Universities to Accelerate AI Talent Development in Colleges and Universities
[51CTO.com original article] [Beijing, China, Dec...
ProfitServer: 50% off VPS in Hong Kong/Singapore/Russia/Spain/Netherlands/Germany, starting from $2.88 per month for unlimited traffic
ProfitServer recently offered a 50% discount on s...
What is 5G IoT and how will it change connectivity?
[[349454]] 5G will fundamentally change the way o...
What else does a smart city need besides technology?
There are questions that need to be answered abou...
The difference between SDN and traditional network operation and maintenance
1. Pain points of traditional network operation a...